Time Article on Hiroshima Anniversary

This week's issue of Time has a cover story on the 60th anniversary of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. I was surprised that the stories were actually fairly "balanced"; you had the obligatory photos and stories of the hibakusha ("bomb affected people"), but overall it was a fairly impartial description of the decision to drop the bomb and the aftermath. One glaring error stood out, though... In the last paragraph of the main story (subscription required) we find this statement:
"There have been some 525 nuclear explosions aboveground since Hiroshima; not one of them has been an act of war." [Emphasis mine]

Now, I know the editors of Time are aware of Nagasaki, which was bombed three days after Hiroshima, so it's clearly an inadvertant error. But still, if you're preparing an important cover story, why not have someone read it first to see if it makes sense? If a lowly sub-blogger can pick this up on his first read-through, it seems like professional editors should be able to do the same...

At this point, I'd normally say something snarky about how the Hiroshima city officials are continually adding thousands of people each year to the list of people killed by the atomic bomb there -- normally 20% of all deaths are caused by cancer anyway, but they apparently add anyone who was in the area at all who died of cancer; clearly not all of these cancers are bomb-related, and at some point you have to expect people who were part of 60 year old history to die anyway-- but that would probably be in bad taste as the anniversary approaches.

Going deep...